Decision Making Questions for NABARD Grade A 2025
Decision Making Questions for NABARD Grade A 2025

NABARD Grade A Exam: Decision Making Questions

Practice NABARD Grade A Decision Making Questions Set. Every year the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) conducted most popular “NABARD Grade A Exam” to recruit Grade A (Assistant Manager) in the Rural Development Banking Service (RDBS). Among the various sections in the NABARD Grade-A exam, the Decision Making section holds significant importance, contributing 10 marks in the phase-1.

Mastering Decision Making Questions for NABARD Grade A 2025 requires a mix of logical reasoning, ethical judgment, and situational awareness. By understanding key topics, practicing sample questions, and avoiding common mistakes, you can boost your score in this critical section. This article provides you Decision Making Questions for the NABARD Grade A Exam 2025. Whether you’re a first-time aspirant or a repeat candidate, this guide will help you master this section effectively.

Decision Making Questions for NABARD Grade A | Set-2

Decision making is a crucial skill for regulatory body exams like NABARD Grade A. This section evaluates a candidate’s ability to analyze situations, assess alternatives, and make logical decisions. The Decision making questions in this section test cognitive reasoning, ethical judgment, and problem-solving capabilities, making them an essential part of the exam. Practicing NABARD Grade A Decision Making questions is an effective way to enhance your preparation. Below you can practice with decision making questions –

Attempt Free Decision Making Mock Tests – Click Here

1. Which of the following is the first step in decision making?

A. Take action
B. Weigh the evidence
C. Identify the decision
D. Identify the alternatives
E. None of the above

Show Correct Answers

Correct Answer – C. Identify the decision

Explanation: 7 steps of the decision-making process

  • Identify the decision.
  • Gather relevant info.
  • Identify the alternatives.
  • Weigh the evidence.
  • Choose among the alternatives.
  • Take action.
  • Review your decision.

2. _______ involves of reacting quickly after the problem occurs, by treating the symptoms.

A. Cost-Benefit Management
B. Causal Graphical Management
C. Management by Objectives
D. Reactive Management
E. None of these

Show Correct Answers

Correct Answer – D. Reactive Management

Explanation- Reactive management consists of reacting quickly after the problem occurs, by treating the symptoms. This type of management is implemented by reactive systems, self-adaptive systems, self-organized systems, and complex adaptive systems. The goal here is to react quickly and alleviate the effects of the problem as soon as possible.

Proactive management is a leadership style that emphasizes strategic planning and risk management rather than taking a reactive approach to situations and business goals. Proactive management can be applied to any industry through leadership that puts an emphasis on planning and forward thinking.

3. ____(A)____ is a type of analysis in which an undesired state of a system is examined. This analysis method is mainly used in safety engineering and reliability engineering to understand how systems can fail, to identify the best ways to reduce risk and to determine (or get a feeling for) event rates of a safety accident or a particular system level (functional) failure. Identify (A).

A. A3 Analysis
B. Factor Analysis
C. Fault Tree Analysis
D. Root Cause Analysis
E. None of these

Show Correct Answers

Correct Answer – C. Fault Tree Analysis

Explanation- Fault tree analysis (FTA) was originally developed in 1962 at Bell Laboratories by H.A. Watson, under a U.S. Air Force Ballistics Systems Division contract to evaluate the Minuteman I Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) Launch Control System.

Fault tree analysis (FTA) is a type of failure analysis in which an undesired state of a system is examined. This analysis method is mainly used in safety engineering and reliability engineering to understand how systems can fail, to identify the best ways to reduce risk and to determine (or get a feeling for) event rates of a safety accident or a particular system level (functional) failure.

Fault tree analysis can be used to:

  • Understand the logic leading to the top event / undesired state.
  • Show compliance with the (input) system safety / reliability requirements.
  • prioritize the contributors leading to the top event- creating the critical equipment/parts/events lists for different importance measures
  • Monitor and control the safety performance of the complex system (e.g., is a particular aircraft safe to fly when fuel valve x malfunctions? For how long is it allowed to fly with the valve malfunction?).
  • Minimize and optimize resources.
  • Assist in designing a system. The FTA can be used as a design tool that helps to create (output / lower level) requirements.
  • Function as a diagnostic tool to identify and correct causes of the top event. It can help with the creation of diagnostic manuals / processes.

You May also like:  Attempt Free Mock Tests, eBooks and PDFs Notes – Click Here

4. It is a decision making style used when a person held responsible has all the knowledge and expertise to churn out the best possible solution to the problem. In such conditions the leader is the sole person to make a decision. Identify the decision making style.

A. Analytical
B. Supportive
C. Authoritative
D. Facilitative
E. None of these

Show Correct Answers

Correct Answer: C. Authoritative

Explanation-One of the methods of decision making calls upon authoritative decision making. Authoritative decision making might be recommended only for team leaders or project managers who have the required ability to use this method of devising decisions. Authoritative decision making is used when a person held responsible has all the knowledge and expertise to churn out the best possible solution to the problem. In such conditions the leader is the sole person to make a decision.

5. It is the process by which humans use mental short cuts to arrive at decisions. It allows people to solve problems and make judgments quickly and efficiently. These rule-of-thumb strategies shorten decision-making time and allow people to function without constantly stopping to think about their next course of action. Identify the Process.

A. Mental decision making
B. Cognitive decision making
C. Heuristic decision making
D. Analytical decision making
E. None of these

Show Correct Answers

Correct Answer – C. Heuristic decision making

Explanation- Heuristics is the process by which humans use mental short cuts to arrive at decisions. Heuristics are simple strategies that humans, animals, organizations, and even machines use to quickly form judgments, make decisions, and find solutions to complex problems. Often this involves focusing on the most relevant aspects of a problem or situation to formulate a solution. While heuristic processes are used to find the answers and solutions that are most likely to work or be correct, they are not always right or the most accurate. Judgments and decisions based on heuristics are simply good enough to satisfy a pressing need in situations of uncertainty, where information is incomplete. In that sense they can differ from answers given by logic and probability.

The economist and cognitive psychologist Herbert A. Simon introduced the concept of heuristics in the 1950s, suggesting there were limitations to rational decision making. In the 1970s, psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman added to the field with their research on cognitive bias. It was their work that introduced specific heuristic models, a field which has only expanded since. While some argue that pure laziness is behind the heuristics process, others argue that it can be more accurate than decisions based on every known factor and consequence, the less-is-more effect.

6. In the following questions, analyse the caselet provided and answer the question that follows based on the individual direction given.

For the post of Digital Marketing Manager in a medium-sized company, two internal candidates, Mr. Ravi and Ms. Sreejita were interviewed by the team lead of the concerned team. After an assignment and interview round, Mr. Ravi was ultimately promoted to the post. His performance on the assignment provided to both candidates, was ranked better by the team lead. A few days later, Ms. Sreejita complained to the HR that the decision was unfair.

Which of the following is the best way to handle the issue raised by Ms. Sreejita?

A. Promote her to another position
B. Suspend her for distrusting the decision of the management
C. Show her Mr. Ravi’s assignment to prove the fairness of the decision
D. Assure her that the decision was fair, and motivate her to work harder next time
E. None of the above

Show Correct Answers

Correct Answer – D. Assure her that the decision was fair, and motivate her to work harder next time

Explanation-The situation talks about how one employee was preferred over the other for a position, based on their performance on an assignment. Here, the best way for the HR to deal with the complaint raised by Ms. Sreejita would be to motivate her to try harder the next time there is the possibility of a promotion, and assure her to keep faith in the selection process. Thus, E is the right answer. A is too extreme, which will make it incorrect. B is incorrect because this would set the precedent that an employee who complains about being rejected for a position should be given another position as compensation. C is incorrect as it would undermine the decision of the team lead. D is neither too extreme nor unreasonable, but is incorrect because the team lead is not obligated to share the assignment of another candidate with the rejected candidate simply because he/ she is dissatisfied with the decision.

You May also like: Best Books for NABARD Grade A & B Exam Preparation 2025 – Phase-1 & Phase-2 Books

7. In the following questions, analyse the caselet provided and answer the question that follows based on the individual direction given.

For the post of Digital Marketing Manager in a medium-sized company, two internal candidates, Mr. Ravi and Ms. Sreejita were interviewed by the team lead of the concerned team. After an assignment and interview round, Mr. Ravi was ultimately promoted to the post. His performance on the assignment provided to both candidates, was ranked better by the team lead. A few days later, Ms. Sreejita complained to the HR that the decision was unfair since she had worked in the company for a longer time than Mr. Ravi.

Which of the following reasons, if cited by Ms. Sreejita, would most support her assertion that the decision was unfair?

A. Mr. Ravi is good friends with the team lead
B. Mr. Ravi is known for often reporting late to work
C. Ms. Sreejita has worked in the company for longer than Mr. Ravi
D. Ms. Sreejita has handled digital marketing projects in the past with good results
E. None of these

Show Correct Answers

Correct Answer – D. Ms. Sreejita has handled digital marketing projects in the past with good results

Explanation-The situation talks about how one employee was preferred over the other for a position, based on their performance on an assignment. Here, the argument that will strengthen Ms. Sreejita’s case would be that she has experience working in the same field previously and has excelled in it. Thus, E is the right answer. A is incorrect as it does not prove Ms. Sreejita’s competence over Mr. Ravi in this field . B is incorrect because greater experience in the company would not necessarily translate to better performance in a specific department. C is incorrect as it would imply that the team lead was partial towards Mr. Ravi, which would render Ms. Sreejita’s argument weak. D is incorrect as the time for which the interview lasted has nothing to do with the selection.

8. In the following questions, analyse the caselet provided and answer the question that follows based on the individual direction given.

For the post of Digital Marketing Manager in a medium-sized company, two internal candidates, Mr. Ravi and Ms. Sreejita were interviewed by the team lead of the concerned team. After an assignment and interview round, Mr. Ravi was ultimately promoted to the post. His performance on the assignment provided to both candidates, was ranked better by the team lead. A few days later, Ms. Sreejita complained to the HR that the decision was unfair since she had worked in the company for a longer time than Mr. Ravi.

Which of the following reasons, if cited by Ms. Sreejita, would most weaken her assertion that the decision was unfair?

A. Mr. Ravi is rude to his colleagues sometimes
B. Mr. Ravi has no experience in the field of digital marketing
C. Ms. Sreejita has always completed deadlines and achieved targets
D. Ms. Sreejita has experience working at a similar post at another company
E. None of the above

Show Correct Answers

Correct Answer – A. Mr. Ravi is rude to his colleagues sometimes

Explanation- The situation talks about how one employee was preferred over the other for a position, based on their performance on an assignment. Here, the argument that will most weaken Ms. Sreejita’s case would be something unrelated to the selection process. B talks about Mr. Ravi’s behaviour apart from his work ethic or performance, which is not related. Thus, B is the right answer. A, C and E would strengthen her arguments. D is incorrect because although it would weaken her argument if she were to point out Mr. Ravi’s incompetence, B would weaken her assertion even further.

You May also like: How to Prepare For NABARD Grade A Exam 2025 – Preparation Tips and Tricks

9. Kamlesh Mukherjee owns and runs a small roadside restaurant by the name of Kamlesh Dhaba. One evening, Kamlesh receives a complaint from a regular customer that a dish served to him had a stale smell.

Which of the following actions is MOST appropriate in the given situation?

A. Fire the head chef immediately
B. Ask the customer to pay half price for the dish
C. Firmly stand one’s ground that there is nothing wrong with the dish
D. Apologise to the customer and offer a replacement for the dish free of charge
E. None of the Above

Show Correct Answers

Correct Answer – D. Apologise to the customer and offer a replacement for the dish free of charge

Explanation-The situation talks about a customer who is dissatisfied with the quality of food served to him and complains that it is stale. Since the customer is a regular one, it is likely that he is not complaining on unreasonable grounds. The most appropriate way to deal with the issue would be to apologise at once to the customer and offer to replace the dish for free. Thus, A is the right answer. B and E do not address the issue faced by the customer, and would end up aggravating it. C would place the entire blame for the incident on the head chef, which would be too extreme. D is incorrect as it is unreasonable to expect the customer to pay at all for a stale dish.

10. In the following questions, analyse the caselet provided and answer the question that follows based on the individual direction given.

Kamlesh Mukherjee owns and runs a small roadside restaurant by the name of Kamlesh Dhaba. One evening, Kamlesh receives a complaint from a regular customer that a dish served to him had a stale smell.

Which of the following actions is LEAST appropriate in the given situation?

A. Deny that the dish is stale and take no action
B. Speak rudely to the customer and deny him service
C. Apologise to the customer and refund his money at once
D. Invite the customer to the kitchen to see for himself how the food is prepared
E. None of these

Show Correct Answers

Correct Answer – B. Speak rudely to the customer and deny him service

Explanation-The situation talks about a customer who is dissatisfied with the quality of food served to him and complains that it is stale. Since the customer is a regular one, it is likely that he is not complaining on unreasonable grounds. The most inappropriate way to deal with the issue would be to treat the customer impolitely and deny him service. Thus, E is the right answer. A and C would be suitable ways for Kamlesh to act. B would be unnecessary, but not unreasonable. D is also inappropriate, but not more than E.

Attempt Free Decision Making Mock Tests – Click Here

The section is designed to evaluate the candidate’s ability to apply theoretical knowledge to practical scenarios, making it both challenging and scoring.

Decision Making Book for NABARD Grade A Exam 2025

At Let’s Study Together (LST) we understand our students’ requirements and keep them in mind, So the LST Team created a Very special “Decision Making Book for NABARD Grade A 2025 – 500 Practice Questions Answers” to crack the upcoming exam. These questions are made by our experts after carefully examining previous years’ question papers of NABARD. If you prepare this thoroughly, you can very easily crack the NABARD Decision Making Section.

Decision Making Book for NABARD Grade A Exam 2025

Common Mistakes to Avoid in Decision Making Section

While many aspirants focus on quantitative and reasoning sections, they often overlook key strategies for Decision Making Questions, leading to avoidable mistakes. Avoiding these common mistakes in Decision Making can significantly improve your NABARD Grade A 2025 score. Focus on ethics, rural banking priorities, and logical reasoning to make the best choices.

  • Overlooking Ethics: Always choose the most ethical option, even if it seems time-consuming.
  • Ignoring NABARD’s Policies: Align answers with NABARD’s mission (rural development focus).
  • Rushing Through Questions: Read each scenario carefully before selecting an answer. Since Decision Making questions are situational, candidates often misinterpret scenarios due to haste.

You May also like: NABARD Grade A & B Previous Year Questions Paper (2015-2024) – Download Free Here

Why Are Decision Making Questions Important?

Decision Making questions are not just about scoring marks—they evaluate whether you possess the judgment, ethics, and problem-solving skills needed for a NABARD Grade A officer’s role. The Decision Making section evaluates a candidate’s ability to:

  • Analyze complex situations
  •  Measures Emotional Intelligence (EQ)
  • Make ethical and logical decisions
  • Handle work-related conflicts
  • Prioritize tasks efficiently
  • Tests Real-Life Problem-Solving Skills
  • Evaluates Ethical & Professional Conduct
  • Assesses Prioritization & Time Management

The Decision Making section is an important component of the NABARD Grade-A exam. By understanding the syllabus, practicing Decision Making Questions, you can easily crack this section. Use the memory-based questions and preparation strategies provided in this article to enhance your NABARD Grade-A preparation and boost your chances of success.